Cit vs surinder pal anand

Author: nfdh

August undefined, 2024

WebJan 3, 2024 · The findings of ld Revisional Authority cannot be sustained as the enquiry in to the relevant issues is duly reflected in the assessment proceedings and only because the ld Pr. CIT being a higher authority and more wiser in experience considered that enquiry in some other aspects would have resulted in different opinion, does not give … WebSep 19, 2024 · The Haryana High Court in the case of CIT vs. Surinder Pal Anand [2010] 192 taxmann 264), under identical circumstances had held as follows’.-“7. Section 44AD of the Act was inserted by the Finance Act, 1994 with effect from 1-4-1994. Sub-section (1) of section 44AD clearly provides that where an assessce is engaged in the business of civil ...

Showing Higher Income Than Benchmark Given - Articles

WebSurinder Pal Anand, 242 CTR 61(P&H). 6. Ld D.R. on the other hand, relied on the order of the CIT(A). 7. of lower authorities and materials available on record. In the instant case, the Assessing Officer found that the assessee has made cash deposit of ₹20,67,668/- … WebJun 29, 2010 · Case Name : CIT Vs. Surinder Pal Anand (Punjab & Haryana High Court) Appeal Number : Appeal No: ITA No. 156 of 2010. Date of Judgement/Order : … fix neck wrinkles

ITA No. 156 of 2010. Case: CIT Vs Surinder Pal Anand. High Court …

WebJul 4, 2024 · Hon'ble bench relied on the preposition laid by Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in case of CIT Vs. Surinder Pal Anand [2010] 192 Taxman 264, wherein in Para 8 … WebThe CIT(A) upheld the addition made by the Assessing Officer on account of initial payment of installment of vend allotted, initial investment in the infrastructure in purchase of … canned fruit salad with pudding

Siti Kanta Pal And Anr. vs Radha Gobinda Sen And Ors. on 21 …

Income Tax on presumptive basis Section 44AD of The Income Tax …

WebJun 29, 2010 · CIT Vs Surinder Pal Anand {2010} 192 Taxmann 264 {Punjab & Haryana} case, it is held that when income is estimated u/s 44AE, the ass... Jayesh N Barad v. … WebAug 29, 2015 · CIT V. Surinder Pal Anand [2010]192Taxman264(P. &H.) Under section 44AD when the books of account were not maintained, income has to be estimated only at 8 per cent. Hence, estimating the income at 8 per cent cannot be regarded as illegal. Commissioner of Gift-tax v. A.Vajjiram& Bros.[2010] 326 ITR 551(MAD.) canned full chickenWebi) CIT v/s Surinder Pal Anand, Surinder Pal Anand, [2011] 242 CTR 0061 (P&H HC) Assessment being made under s. 44AD, the assessee was not under obligation to explain individual entry of cash deposit in the bank unless such entry had no nexus with the gross receipts and therefore no addition under s. 68 was called for. canned gandules

"Web% - 0 0 0 ) - % +% ! + = >> : 0 % ! 0 ! ... 9 ! + % 0 % ( ( )2 0 + ( 0 )- 0 %- % 0 " - Cit vs surinder pal anand

Cit vs surinder pal anand

Smt. Sonia, Mandi Gobindgarh vs Assessee on 15 July, 2015

WebMar 14, 2024 · Surinder Pal Anand 192 Taxman 264 for the preposition that once the exemption from maintaining books of account has been provided under the special provision and presumptive tax @ 8% has been made the basis for determining taxable income, the assessee was not under any obligation to explain individual entry of cash deposit in the … WebJan 30, 2024 · i) CIT vs. Surinder Pal Anand [2010] 192 taxmann 264 (P&H HC) ii) Nand Lal Popli vs. DCIT [ITA1161&1162/Chd/2013 dt. 14/06/2016] Accordingly the addition of Rs. 27,94,306/- u/s. 68/69A was directed to be deleted. The view full text of the judgment: Click here --------------------------------- Summarized by: CA. Shashank A. Mehta

Did you know?

WebSep 18, 2024 · The Haryana High Court in the case of CIT vs. Surinder Pal Anand [2010] 192 taxmann 264), under identical circumstances had held as follows’.- “7. Section 44AD … WebAgainst this decision, the Pal defendant as well as the plaintiffs have appealed to this Court the Pal defendants in Appeal No. 2587 of 1926 and the plaintiffs in Appeal No. 229 of …

Webdecision of Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of CIT Vs Surinder Pal Anand 192 Taxmann 264 and submitted that once the return of income is filed U/s 44AD of the Act, the turnover declared by the assessee cannot be doubted. The assessee is not required to explain each WebJan 16, 2024 · CIT v. Surinder Pal Anand [2010] 192 TAXMAN 264 (PUNJ. & HAR.) In an appropriate case, Assessing Officer can make addition in respect of both cash credits …

WebJan 8, 2024 · The Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of CIT vs. Surinder Pal Anand [2010] 192 taxmann 264 held that once under special provision of section 44AD … WebCIT vs. Surinder Pal Anand [2010] 192 taxmann 264), had held as follows:- “7. Section 44AD of the Act was inserted by the Finance Act, 1994 with effect from 1-4-1994. Sub-section (1) of section 44AD clearly provides that where an assessee is engaged in the business of civil construction or supply

WebSep 19, 2024 · Punjab and Haryana High court distinguished and overruled its own decision in CIT Vs. Surinder Pal Anand 48 DTR 135 in which cash deposited in bank was held from business itself.

WebIn the application, the four aforesaid daughters were also mentioned against column 3. Inder Pal, the respondent, it appears, was a nominee under the policy; Yogesh Kumar, … canned full english breakfastWebSep 11, 2024 · The Haryana High Court in the case of CIT vs. Surinder Pal Anand [2010] 192 taxmann 264), had held as follows:- “7. Section 44AD of the Act was inserted by the Finance Act, 1994 with effect from 1-4-1994. fix neebsWebCommissioner Of Income Tax-Ii vs Gurinder Pal Singh on 25 March, 2013 User Queries cash deposit furniture mandi gobindgarh 44af section 44af cash deposit in bank 44ad 2015 july withdrawal from bank surinder pal anand Try out our Premium Memberservices: Virtual Legal Assistant, Query Alert Serviceand an ad-free experience. canned garbanzo bean nutrition informationWebJan 4, 1994 · v. Surinder Pal Anand . ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. 1. This appeal has been filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, “the Act” … fix needWebAfter relying upon a judgment of this Court in CIT vs. Surinder Pal Anand (2010) 48 DTR 135 (P&H), the Commissioner allowed the assessee's appeal and ordered deletion of the amount of Rs. 18,31,500/- as ordered to be added to his income by the assessing officer. canned gamesWebJun 29, 2010 · Case: CIT Vs Surinder Pal Anand. High Court of Punjab (India) Judgment Cited in Precedent Map Related Vincent Judgment: Adarsh Kumar Goel, J. 1. canned garbanzo beans deliveryWebPunjab and Haryana High court distinguished and overruled its own decision in CIT v. Surinder Pal Anand 48 DTR 135 in which cash deposited in bank was held from business itself. The provisions of presumptive taxation are enacted to facilitate computation of total income and filing of return of income. canned garbanzo beans nutrition